The offering and its timetable
Anthropic proposes 825 million Class A shares at $70–$78 under ANT on Nasdaq. Its roadshow began November 10. The company’s IPO site expects pricing on November 18 and trading on November 19, subject to regulatory clearance and market conditions. 060775
Latest offering terms. The midpoint yields $61.1B of public gross proceeds, plus a separate $26B Class N placement. The diluted valuation is about $1.33T at $74. Run-rate revenue reached $81B in October, and contractual obligations total $900.9B. 06
Primary and secondary shares
Anthropic offers 801.4M new shares, or 97.1% of the base deal. Selling holders offer 23.6M shares, or 2.9%. At $74, the company’s gross public proceeds are $59.3B and selling holders receive $1.8B before fees. See the capitalization bridge and share classes. 06
International distribution
The filing identifies public offers in Australia, Canada, selected EEA countries, Japan, Switzerland, and the UK. Anthropic intends to list on Nasdaq and limits the overseas plans to distribution. A Japanese filing reportedly gives an estimated ceiling of ¥552.9B (about US$3.5B) for local distribution. 0514
From registration to the first trade
- Public S-1. Disclosed the proposed listing, capital structure, and financial results through June. 04
- S-1/A No. 1. Added September financials, quantified infrastructure commitments, identified planned retail platforms, and added a disclosure about AI accelerating AI research. 06
- Expected pricing. The company’s IPO timetable uses this date, subject to clearance. The final prospectus will establish the final terms. Company timetable 75
Roadshow takeaways · the company’s public pitch
Enterprise expansion
The public IPO materials highlight more than 11,900 customers generating at least $100K of trailing revenue, over 12× the year-earlier count. Customer examples emphasize extending AI from technical teams into company-wide workflows. These are company-selected examples. 75
Compute efficiency and the margin bridge
Anthropic highlights more than 4× improvement in revenue divided by compute and infrastructure expense from Q1 2025 to Q3 2026. This ratio combines revenue and costs; it does not isolate hardware efficiency. Q3’s rounded 15% adjusted operating margin sits alongside a −3% GAAP operating margin. 75
The public presentation covers the product, enterprise strategy, frontier research, compute and financial model. The company’s materials show $17B Q3 revenue and a $23.3B net loss, including a $21.9B non-cash financing-instrument revaluation charge. Investor questions: can customer expansion and serving efficiency persist as capacity and competition grow? View the public roadshow. 7506
Still unknown: The public materials reviewed do not disclose live investor orders, an allocation book, or a full record of private roadshow Q&A. The figures above are company representations; a strong presentation does not establish aftermarket demand.
One global offer, different application windows
The prospectus describes a coordinated global distribution into Australia, Canada, selected EEA markets, Japan, Switzerland and the UK. Those channels feed the same IPO, final offer price and Nasdaq listing. Local deadlines, currencies and settlement procedures differ. A withdrawn local tranche can be reallocated to the remaining jurisdictions. 06
| Date | Distribution event | Meaning for buyers |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | Global roadshow and UK retail launch | Participating platforms gather requests before a common final price. 0779 |
| Nov 11 | Australian applications open | The local prospectus opens the Australian window. 78 |
| Nov 12 | SBI announces Japanese applications | A local broker begins accepting orders for the expected November 19 U.S. listing. 80 |
| Nov 17 · 5 p.m. AEDT | Australian offer expected to close | Broker eligibility and submission cutoffs apply. 78 |
| Nov 18 | UK application deadline and expected U.S. pricing | UK dates are stated in London time. The global price is expected after the U.S. bookbuild. 7975 |
| Nov 19 U.S. / Nov 20 UK settlement | Expected Nasdaq debut, followed by local settlement | Settlement timing and broker access determine when a buyer can trade an allocation. 7579 |
This timetable follows the published offering documents. Dates are indicative, use the stated local time zones and can change. Individual broker cutoffs may be earlier. 7879
What this means for demand. These are overlapping routes into the initial sale. The documents provide no program of later exchange debuts intended to introduce buyers in waves. Subsequent demand can come from investors who received partial allocations, new aftermarket buyers, index additions and later unlocks. The effect on the stock price remains uncertain. Market-structure inference 061618
What changed since the November 2 edition
| Item | November 2 | November 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Price / base deal | Undisclosed | $70–$78 / 825M Class A shares |
| Concurrent private placement | IPO placement terms undisclosed | $26B of Class N at the IPO price |
| Capitalization | Pro forma counts left blank | 13.1B legal A+N outstanding and an 18.0B diluted bridge at $74 |
| Compute obligations | $895.4B aggregate / $69.8B next 12 months | $900.9B aggregate / $70.7B next 12 months |
| Conditional portion | $213.8B | $186.2B |
| Run-rate revenue | September financials | $81B October operating metric, up $10B from September |
| Release schedules | Several percentages blank | Early-release percentages and a 29% founder release at the specified Q1/180-day event |
The November 2 filing had already supplied Q3 financial statements and named six expected retail platforms. 0506
Bookrunners, syndicate and allocation
Explore other IPOs in the standalone Portfolio ThinkTank IPO Demand Explorer. This brief keeps the Anthropic case. Calculator edited November 13; source facts retain their dated snapshots.
Where supply meets demand
Follow supply from the left and potential buyers from the right. Switch the right-hand view to trace investment managers, account platforms, custodians and the underlying capital owners.
Scenario inputs and routing
The IPO demand curves apply our estimated buyer interest and price response to each distinct addressable buying pool, with a shared-budget discount. Custody assets and account-based estimates add no extra demand. Each channel’s route weights and Anthropic’s supply weights are separately normalized to 100%.
Distributor weights
The interval varies modeled demand and modeled capacity by the selected percentage. Each row is a separate sensitivity. The endpoints do not represent a single joint book and should not be summed across distributors. Historical commitments stay fixed.
Supply & Demand and Price Imbalance
Edit a buying assumption and inspect its live price response.
| Buyer channel | Addressable buying pool · $B | Estimated buyer interest at this price | Demand · M shares |
|---|
Edit buying pools, interest estimates and supply
Buying pool = dollars represented by plausible positions across this channel before awareness, decision and execution haircuts. Choose a distinct pool for this issue and phase, after excluding existing holdings. Our buyer-interest estimates and price curves convert that potential pool into modeled executable orders. These estimates are weighted by potential buying dollars; average intended ticket sizes are already represented by the pool. The shared-budget discount removes overlapping dollars once. AUM, custody assets and client cash references supply no automatic buying pool.
The four curved channels represent discretionary buying; the separate index target is excluded from their pools. Base pool seeds total 5× reference gross IPO value for the IPO phase and 20% for the aftermarket, split 50% / 20% / 15% / 15%. These sizing seeds remain unverified and editable.
Awareness to executable buying
Each estimated rate is conditional on clearing the prior stage, weighted by potential position dollars. The “want to” estimate uses the most attractive modeled price; the price curve applies the remaining price sensitivity. Conditional rates can reflect correlated decisions. Leave unknown stages blank.
The model uses the lower of your any-price demand estimate and the estimated six-stage product as its upper endpoint. Estimated demand at a specific price = right-terminal estimate + (upper endpoint − right-terminal estimate) × relative price response. The right-terminal estimate must stay at or below the upper endpoint.
Selected curve points
Prices rise across each curve. Buyer-demand percentages stay level or fall between the two endpoint estimates. Linear uses the first and last anchor prices; changing the viewed price axis preserves those anchors. Editing an interior point selects Custom anchors. Editing a buyer endpoint updates its demand estimate. Estimated aftermarket selling interest stays level or rises.
| Anchor | Price · $ | Estimated buy / sell interest · % |
|---|
Aftermarket supply = assumed available float × holders’ selling-interest curve. This describes willingness to transfer holdings within the chosen window. Changing the window requires reviewing the participation and selling assumptions; it does not multiply demand automatically.
Index floor · target, existing holdings and assumptions
Incremental index demand = target less existing holdings, floored at zero. Anthropic and SPCX start with one conditional NDX reference: $623B of tracker assets × an assumed 1% weight ÷ the reference price. The asset proxy is dated 2025, includes an estimated managed-account component, and comes from the brief’s index-asset analysis. The weight, incremental purchases and zero initial holdings are best guesses. Other index families are excluded to avoid overlapping pools. 111
The default aftermarket scenario assumes inclusion within its window; change this if the timing fails. The default IPO phase excludes index demand and shows its conditional target as a preview. Holding target shares fixed is a local price-range approximation; actual free-float weights, caps, assets, sampling and existing exposure can change the purchases. Eligibility and actual index orders remain unknown.
A price-insensitive share target after assumed inclusion. Trackers follow the mandate as price changes. Their dollar purchase cost rises with price.
How the demand assumptions work
Estimate each channel’s buyer demand before price sensitivity, its price-insensitive right terminal, and the function between them. The two demand inputs are percentages of potential buying dollars within the selected phase or window. Share demand is calculated from those dollars at each price. An IPO allocation and completed purchase still depend on available supply.
Three assumptions for each buyer channel. Linear is the starting demand function. It connects the any-price estimate at the left anchor to the price-insensitive estimate at the right anchor. The right-terminal percentage holds beyond that anchor; share demand continues to vary as buying dollars are divided by price. The starting terminal estimate is 0%. Every input is an editable estimate.
Reading the model. Modeled demand shares = addressable buying dollars × estimated buyer interest at this price × (1 − overlap discount) ÷ price. Imbalance = demand shares − supply shares. Coverage = demand ÷ supply. Sensitivity varies interest estimates within each channel’s interest assumption; conditional index targets stay fixed. A crossing is conditional on these inputs and the price range. The bands carry no statistical confidence level. Actual orders, buyer interest, dollar-pool sizes and seller willingness remain unknown.
The IPO curves update discretionary buyer-channel demand in the base-offering Sankey above. Aftermarket assumptions have their own state and time window. The map excludes the option and conditional index target.
Editing base supply scales the worksheet’s primary/secondary split proportionally. Edit that split in the worksheet when using a different assumption.
Demand beyond the initial allocation. Managers and account platforms show potential reach into funds, managed accounts and brokerage clients. Unfilled IPO interest and new buyers may enter after trading begins. Custody links identify servicing relationships. Dashed links have no measured dollar or share amount and add no extra demand to the scenario totals. ANT buyer assignments and follow-through remain unknown. 0615119
Potential buying after trading starts
First 20 trading sessions · selected brokerage/customer pools. This separate account-based scenario estimates fresh purchase intent after eligibility, duplication and prior-IPO-interest adjustments. Institutional manager and custody assets are excluded from this range. Client assets provide scale; no asset-allocation estimate is added.
Edit the best guess and inspect client scale
All percentages below are editorial assumptions. The defaults use 0.5%–2% participation, $2,500–$7,500 per participating decision unit, a 25%–50% cross-platform duplicate discount and 50%–75% incremental interest. The final factor removes assumed overlap with already satisfied or previously modeled IPO interest. Participation applies once over 20 sessions.
Per-brand eligibility reduces source counts for account duplication within the brand, funding, ability to buy individual stocks, geography and mandate restrictions. Customers, households and accounts retain their disclosed definitions. Those conversions are best guesses. Fund managers and custodians are outside this selected account model.
| Brand / date | Disclosed client assets | Disclosed count / scope | Model scope and eligible share | Potential purchases · best guess |
|---|
Calculation. Source count × assumed eligible share × (1 − cross-platform duplicate discount) × participation × average purchase × incremental-interest share. Lower demand uses the higher duplicate discount and the other low assumptions; upper demand uses the lower discount and the other high assumptions.
Counting rules. Vanguard’s intermediary-held fund investors are excluded. Morgan Stanley contributes only its self-directed channel; BofA contributes only consumer investment accounts. Robinhood uses funded customers once; Schwab already includes TD Ameritrade. Assets, cash balances and separate account/customer counts are never summed into this demand calculation. The adjustment reduces assumed overlap; actual cross-platform identities remain unknown.
Independent account-based cross-check. This range is excluded from the demand-curve totals. Do not add this range to the IPO order model, unmet demand, or index-linked exposure targets. It covers potential discretionary buying, with no prediction of net inflows, opening price or sustained price support. Buyer interest, available float and offsetting sellers remain unobserved.
BNY, State Street and Northern Trust · who decides and who holds the assets?
The decision path above can lead to a fund or brokerage account whose securities are held at a custodian. Custody, clearing, collateral and settlement support the trade. The owner or delegated manager supplies investment authority. These are role examples; no specific ANT manager-to-custodian relationship is asserted.
| Group · Sep 30, 2026 | Custody / administration assets | Management assets | Investor implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| BNY | $63.4T AUC/A | $2.2T AUM | Investment management and Pershing/servicing have separate functions. 135143 |
| State Street | $59.2T AUC/A | $6.3T AUM* | Investment Management / SPDR mandates sit alongside the servicing business. 136 |
| Northern Trust | $19.9T AUC/A | $2.0T AUM | Asset and wealth management coexist with institutional custody. 137 |
AUC/A means assets under custody and/or administration; AUM means assets under management. The figures overlap within and across firms and can include non-equity assets. They are never added together or converted into the aftermarket-demand estimate. *State Street AUM includes about $172B for which an affiliate acts solely as marketing agent. Actual ANT orders and allocations remain unknown.
Distributor table and underwriting commitments
Capital structure and share classes
Authorized shares are a legal ceiling. Issued shares include outstanding shares and any treasury shares. Outstanding shares exclude treasury shares. Fully diluted counts additionally reflect specified securities and assumptions. Capitalization figures are context for the offering.
See Anthropic's proposed post-IPO charter and Class N conversion terms.
Concurrent Class N placement. Google and NVIDIA commit $10B each, AMD $2.5B, Broadcom, Micron and Microsoft $1B each, and TSMC $0.5B. This $26B financing converts to about 351.4M restricted Class N shares at $74. It closes conditionally after the IPO and sits outside the public syndicate flow above. 06
Names on the prospectus cover
Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, J.P. Morgan, Citigroup, Barclays, Wells Fargo Securities, BofA Securities, Deutsche Bank Securities, RBC Capital Markets, UBS, BMO, BNP Paribas, Crédit Agricole CIB, Jefferies, Mizuho, MUFG, TD Securities, BTIG, Cantor, Capital One Securities, Macquarie Capital, and Société Générale. 06
Demand curve and pricing
The range is indicative. Underwriters assess orders and can revise terms before final pricing. Reporting says the book is covered at the range and retail is targeted at about 20%. The actual order book, channel percentages and final customer allocations remain undisclosed. The worksheet uses 20% as a reported retail assumption. 0608
Greenshoe and stabilization
A 30-day option covers up to 123.8M additional issuer shares, equal to 15% of the base offering. Full exercise takes public shares sold to 948.8M and public gross value to $70.2B at $74. Option exercise can add $9.2B of issuer gross proceeds at that price. 06
Where demand can come from
Index trackers buy according to their mandates. Discretionary investors choose whether the price and business justify an investment. Each group enters on its own schedule.
Price-insensitive demand · index mandates
Capitalization-weighted funds seek to match an index. Once ANT is admitted, trackers generally need exposure at the index’s investable weight, even if their managers regard the stock as expensive. Eligibility, free float, voting rules and the effective inclusion date determine the order. The term “price-insensitive” describes the mandate; a purchase amount or date is conditional. 161821
Fast entry is possible
Nasdaq evaluates a qualifying top-40 IPO on trading day seven and typically adds it after 15 trading days. If day 15 falls in a scheduled rebalance month, the index calendar governs the date. A three-times-float cap can constrain the weighting. 16
Fifth-day route
Eligible IPOs can enter after the fifth trading day if investable market cap clears the Russell Top 500 breakpoint and other criteria. Certain low-float or low-voting-rights names may qualify if scheduled lockup releases satisfy the tests within 12 months. Quarterly and semiannual reviews are additional routes. 1819
Passive buyers and index-linked assets
Asset pools below are dated reference points, rather than November 2026 flow forecasts. P · provider estimate D · derived A · illustrative assumption A mutual-fund / managed-account split is estimated only where the provider does not publish it.
| Family / reference date | ETF / ETP assets | Index mutual funds | Managed / institutional accounts and other | Tracker pool | Broader benchmarked pool |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nasdaq-100 2025 average | $587B · P Includes leveraged, inverse and option-overlay ETFs. | $75B · P | $50B · A Planning case; $25B–$75B sensitivity. Actual SMA total is unpublished. | ~$623B · D/A Core proxy: $498B ordinary ETF categories + $75B mutual funds + $50B assumed accounts. | $1.41T ecosystem · P Includes $647B derivatives notional and insurance/notes. A separate active-benchmarked AUM total is unquantified. 111 |
| S&P 500 Dec 31, 2024 | $2.3T · P | ~$3.7T · A 55% of reported non-ETP tracking assets. | ~$3.0T · A Remaining 45%; includes institutional funds, SMAs and insurance. | ~$9.0T · D $2.3T ETP + $6.7T non-ETP. The mutual/account split does not change this total. | ~$16.2T fund/account reference · D Adds $7.2T active benchmarked assets. The $20.2T headline also includes ~$4.0T derivatives. 112 |
| Russell U.S. Dec 31, 2024 | ~$0.8T · A Planning split; compare the provider’s $658B ETF reference from Sep 2024. | ~$0.7T · A | ~$1.2T · A Institutional / managed / other passive vehicles. | $2.7T · P Reported family passive AUM; vehicle allocations are illustrative. | $11.8T · P Includes $9.1T active benchmarked AUM. A later June 2025 family total is $12.2T. 11311420 |
Assumptions, uncertainty and what can become an ANT order
- Nasdaq-100. The $498B core ETF proxy is QQQ $351B + QQQM $53B + other ETFs $94B, excluding $41B leveraged/inverse and $47B overlay categories from the $587B total; source rounding explains the $1B difference. The $50B managed-account assumption is an unmeasured sensitivity, not an observed holding. The resulting proxy ranges from about $598B to $648B at $25B–$75B of assumed accounts. Nasdaq describes active managers benchmarking to NDX as uncommon. 111
- S&P 500. The provider reports $6.7T of non-ETP tracking assets together. The 55% mutual / 45% other split is a planning convention. Explore either component at roughly ±50%, constrained to the published combined amount. The directly observed funded-vehicle proxy remains about $9.0T; derivatives notional is reported separately. 112
- Russell. The $0.8T / $0.7T / $1.2T vehicle split allocates the rounded $2.7T passive total. Treat each component as a ±50% planning sensitivity while holding that total fixed. Only ~$1.9T of the matched snapshot is in large-cap and broad-market passive mandates; mid/small-cap pools would not ordinarily buy a mega-cap ANT. Style, inclusion and investable-weight rules further limit eligible demand. 113114
- Interpretation. Index-tracking exposure = relevant replicating assets × effective ANT weight. At a hypothetical 1% weight, the core NDX proxy implies ~$6.2B, S&P’s funded-vehicle proxy ~$89.9B, and Russell large/broad passive mandates ~$18.6B. These are exposure targets after qualification. Existing ownership, derivatives, sampling, timing and client restrictions determine incremental stock purchases. Active managers retain discretion. The families and their products overlap; these illustrations are not additive.
Load a reference pool into the existing worksheet, then change the weight and turnover assumptions:
Still unknown: The unpublished mutual-fund / SMA splits and any distinct active NDX benchmark pool are not established by these sources. The figures are mixed-date estimates. Broader benchmarked assets do not create mandatory IPO purchases.
When do funds become buyers? A physical replicator typically needs exposure when membership takes effect. Sampling, derivatives, creations in kind, and trading ahead of the rebalance affect how much hits the public market and when. No current IPO allocation follows automatically from index eligibility. 161824
Discretionary demand · conviction and access
Who chooses to buy?
Active institutions, hedge funds, wealth advisers and retail investors can accept the valuation, wait for a lower price or choose another company. Broad interest in AI and the scarcity of listed frontier-model specialists can attract attention. Product economics, portfolio limits and allocation access determine whether that attention becomes an order. The Sankey shows editable channel scenarios. 0615
Available cash and new supply
Anthropic held $95.6B in cash and $36.3B in short-term investments on September 30 to fund its own operations. Investor capacity depends on their cash, portfolio reallocations and mandate limits. Primary and secondary shares, an exercised greenshoe and eligible lockup releases add tradable supply. 06
Explore valuation, IPO scale and market-flow comparisons in the Comparisons chapter.
Comparisons
Place the selected IPO valuation beside U.S.-listed companies, historical offerings and familiar market flows. Each comparison states its date, units and share basis.
Where Anthropic sits among U.S.-listed companies
The ten companies nearest above and ten nearest below Anthropic’s selected implied equity value within the dated mega-cap and large-cap snapshot. Changing the IPO price or diluted share count updates the selection.
Enter an IPO price and diluted share count in the worksheet above.
| Company / ticker | Market cap · USD | TTM revenue · USD |
|---|---|---|
| Anthropic ANT · selected IPO scenario | — | $35.3B |
Anthropic uses the worksheet’s diluted economic shares × selected offer price. Peer market caps use outstanding-share values from the dated snapshot. Anthropic’s $35.282B TTM revenue sums Q4 2025 through Q3 2026. Peer TTM reporting periods can differ. 06
Peer snapshot source loading.
What does a $61B public offering look like?
Compare the $61.1B base public sale at $74 with familiar balances and flows. It includes primary and secondary shares. Issuer gross funding is $85.3B after the separate $26B private placement; the public-market comparisons below use the $61.1B sale. 06
| Reference / period | Observed scale | ANT relative size | Meaning and limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Money market fund assets Balance · Nov 4, 2026 | $8.0T total $3.1T retail subset | 0.76% of total ~2.0% of retail assets | Investor cash-like savings span operating, liquidity and investment needs. Availability for ANT is unknown. Retail is already inside the total. 130 |
| U.S. equity daily trading Turnover · Oct 2026 average | 17.3B shares / day | 825M offered ≈ 4.8% of one day’s share count | Count-only comparison across securities with different prices. Repeated trading measures activity; it does not measure fresh buying cash. 133 |
| NVIDIA daily dollar turnover Dated proxy · Nov 5 snapshot | ~$19.5B / day | ~3.1× that daily dollar turnover | The existing volume × price reference supplies dollar context. It cannot predict ANT turnover or price impact. 2928 |
| Average weekly Treasury auction volume Gross issuance · Aug 1–Oct 31, 2026 | $79.1B / week Nominal coupons / FRNs | ~77% of average weekly volume | Weekly average of the August–October nominal coupon / floating-rate auction sample. Bills and TIPS are excluded. 132 |
| Large scheduled Treasury sale Gross issuance · Nov 2026 | $70B 5-year note auction | ~87% of this one auction | Risk, maturity, dealer intermediation and the buyer base differ from equity issuance. 132 |
| November Treasury refunding Three auctions · Nov 9–12 | $125B gross ~$28B net new cash | ~49% of gross | Most issuance refinances maturing debt. Gross auction volume and net funding have different meanings. 132 |
| ETF net issuance Net flow estimate · week to Nov 4 | +$49.8B long-term ETFs | ~1.2× one week’s net issuance | Includes multiple asset classes and possible in-kind creations. This is a flow reference, with no assumed ANT earmark. 131 |
| Long-term mutual fund flows Net flow estimate · same week | −$32.7B net outflows | No positive inflow to compare against | Portfolio reallocations can still finance purchases during net outflows. This component is already included in the combined figure below. 131 |
| Combined mutual funds + ETFs Net flow estimate · same week | +$17.2B | ~3.6× one week’s combined net inflow | ETF issuance plus mutual fund flows. Do not add the combined figure to its two components or extrapolate this week into a monthly forecast. 131 |
Cash examples and calculation notes
Selected broker cash references. Schwab reported client cash at 8.9% of $13.3T assets on September 30, implying ~$1.2T. IBKR reported $180.5B of client credit balances, including bank sweeps, at October 31. Robinhood reported $49.1B of customer cash at September 30. The public sale equals about 5.1%, 33.8% and 1.2× these respective references. Cash can back obligations, other holdings or operational needs. 122123124
Reproducible arithmetic. Public sale = 825M × $74 = $61.05B. Treasury weekly sample: ($352B + $343B + $345B) × 7 ÷ 92 calendar days (Aug 1–Oct 31, 2026) = $79.1B per week; $61.05B ÷ $79.13B = 77.2%. The $70B reference is a large scheduled coupon sale, rather than a maximum across all Treasury security types. Fund-flow components reconcile as $49.83B − $32.67B = $17.16B. Source rounding is retained internally. 06132131
Use for scale. Balances, turnover, gross issuance and net flows answer different questions. Money funds, broker assets, broker cash and fund flows overlap. None of these references is added to the account-based demand estimate or treated as a pool committed to ANT.
Four IPO scale comparisons
| IPO | First trade | Base public sale | Market cap at IPO | First year price IPO offer = 100 | Why compare it? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SpaceXSPCX | $75.0B | $1.77TBasic post-offer sharesShare basisBasic post-base-offering common shares: 7,380,196,910 Class A plus 5,695,668,265 Class B, valued at $135. Excludes the additional-share option and unissued options/awards. | +3.7%Partial year Through Nov 12, 2026Price history | Recent mega IPO. The exercised option later took gross proceeds to $86.3B. 10349 | |
| Saudi Aramco2222 | $25.6B | $1.71TBasic post-offer sharesShare basis200 billion basic ordinary shares × SAR32 = SAR6.4 trillion, converted at SAR3.75 per US dollar. The IPO sold existing government shares. | +10.9%First year Through Dec 10, 2020Price history | Earlier mega IPO. The selling government received the proceeds. 104 | |
| AlibabaBABA | $21.8B | $167.6BBasic post-offer sharesShare basis2,465,005,966 post-base-offering basic ordinary shares × $68 per ADS, with one ordinary share per ADS at the IPO. Excludes additional issuer shares under the option and unissued options/RSUs. | -3.3%First year Through Sep 18, 2015Price history | A large international technology distribution into U.S. markets. 105 | |
| ArmARM | $4.9B | $52.3BBasic post-offer sharesShare basis1,026,054,856 post-offering basic ordinary shares × $51 per ADS, with one ordinary share per ADS. Includes 820,856 shares issuable at completion; excludes 41,779,288 additional listed award shares. | +189.0%First year Through Sep 13, 2024Price history | Technology scarcity and cornerstone indications; entirely a selling-holder offer. 73 |
Reading the sparklines. All four use the same one-year time axis and the same indexed vertical scale (75–375; IPO offer = 100). Daily closes are divided by the offer price; the percentage is the last observed close’s change from the offer. SpaceX has a partial year through November 12, 2026; its remaining time is blank. First-year charts end at the last trading close on or before the anniversary. These are share-price changes excluding cash dividends. Aramco’s later bonus-share adjustments are reversed to restore the original 2019–2020 quoted prices. Base public sales exclude options; market caps use basic post-offer shares, with each share basis stated in its cell. U.S. dollar values for Aramco use SAR 3.75 per dollar.
ANT at $74: the $61.1B base public offer is about 81% of SpaceX’s, 2.4× Aramco’s, 2.8× Alibaba’s and 12.5× Arm’s. Base-sale comparisons exclude overallotment options and private placements. Neither a trillion-dollar company valuation nor a public share sale of this scale means $1T is being raised. Aramco and SpaceX both had IPO equity valuations above $1T before Anthropic’s proposed debut. 064910310410573
Scale check. The $61.1B midpoint public deal is roughly 3.1 times NVIDIA’s ~$19.5B daily turnover proxy from the November 5 snapshot. SpaceX sold roughly $86.3B gross at its IPO including the exercised option. Anthropic’s private Class N placement adds company funding alongside the public sale. 06292849
Public market scale and multiples
| Company / scenario | Equity value | TTM revenue | Equity value / sales |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA | $4.03T | $303.0B | 13.3× |
| Alphabet | $3.69T | $471.1B | 7.8× |
| SpaceX · includes xAI | $1.95T | $32.0B | 61.0× |
| Meta | $1.61T | $241.6B | 6.7× |
| ANT · $74 midpoint / diluted | $1.33T | $35.3B | 37.8× |
Equity values use a November 12 snapshot around 11:18 a.m. ET. Revenue is the latest available TTM, ending in July for NVIDIA and September for the others. SpaceX includes xAI and Cursor; its equity value is approximated from the $143.89 quote and 13.6B reported shares, and TTM revenue is derived from its filings. ANT uses the $74 midpoint and diluted bridge. 28666768697071899006
At the $74 midpoint, diluted equity value is 37.8× TTM sales, 19.7× Q3 revenue annualized, and 16.5× October’s run-rate metric. The three denominators measure different periods and assumptions. Across the indicative price band, TTM equity-value-to-sales is about 35.7×–39.8× on the fixed midpoint diluted bridge. 06
At $1.26T–$1.41T, the diluted value equals about 1.7%–1.9% of the Russell 3000’s $75.6T aggregate market cap at the April 2026 rank date. Actual index weights use investable shares and index-specific rules. 2018
Growth and cost of scale
Q3 added $5.4B of quarterly revenue and $4.3B of compute and infrastructure expense versus Q2. Nine-month revenue reached $33.2B. 06
Quarterly revenue
Revenue growth
FY24 revenue was 9.4× FY23 and FY25 was 11.9× FY24. That works out to roughly 958% annualized growth from FY23 to FY25 on a small starting base.
Trailing 12 months adds Q4 2025 to the first nine months of 2026. The Q3 annualized pace is $67.8B (4 × Q3). Each uses a different measurement period. 06
| USD billions, unless noted | Q2 2026 | Q3 2026 | 9M 2026 | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 11.6 | 17.0 | 33.2 | Q3 +47% sequentially and +1,127% YoY. |
| Compute and infrastructure | 5.6 | 9.9 | 18.8 | 48% to 58% of quarterly revenue. Q3 includes $5.0B of short-term compute. |
| GAAP operating income (loss) | 0.97 | −0.57 | −1.3 | Q3 operating margin −3.3%, down from +8.4%. |
| Adjusted operating income | 2.2 | 2.5 | 4.1 | Q3 margin 14.5%, down from 19.3%. Q3 add-backs include $1.1B of stock pay and $2.0B of non-cash charitable contributions. |
| GAAP net loss | −66.3 | −23.3 | −104.0 | Fair-value charges on notes, derivatives and SAFEs were $59.6B in Q2, $21.9B in Q3, and $94.3B in 9M. |
| Operating cash flow | — | 2.6* | 6.6 | 9M 2025 was −$2.0B. Working-capital timing affects the comparison. |
| Purchases of property and equipment | — | — | 0.93 | Direct capex leaves out operating cash payments and lease or equipment prepayments. 9M lease and equipment prepayments were $2.0B. |
Interim figures are unaudited. *Q3 cash flow is 9M less H1. Adjusted operating income is company-defined. At conversion, affected notes can stop generating fair-value changes. The timing and treatment of remaining instruments can differ. The GAAP net loss and operating cash flow describe different parts of the business. 0405
Debt, liquidity and standard ratios
At September 30, Anthropic had $6.203B of convertible-note principal, all long term, and $1.674B of finance lease liabilities. Cash and short-term investments totaled $131.845B. These are actual, unaudited balances before the proposed IPO and concurrent private placement. 06
| USD billions · September 30, 2026 | Current | Long term | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Convertible notes · contractual principal | 0.000 | 6.203 | 6.203 |
| Bank borrowings drawn | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Finance lease liabilities · present value | 0.349 | 1.325 | 1.674 |
| Debt principal + finance leases | 0.349 | 7.528 | 7.877 |
| Operating lease liabilities · shown separately | 0.274 | 2.536 | 2.810 |
| Convertible notes · GAAP fair-value carrying amount | 0.000 | 130.502 | 130.502 |
Current means classified within current liabilities; long term means noncurrent. The two note rows show alternative measurements of the same instruments. Finance leases are already included within other balance-sheet liability lines. Total current liabilities of $11.671B also include supplier payables, accruals, deferred revenue and current operating leases. 06
Maturities and interest rates
The outstanding Amazon rollover notes carry 0% interest: $2.186B matures in March 2034, and $4.017B across January, May and November 2035, subject to earlier repayment or conversion. Conversion is limited by Amazon’s 12% ownership cap. Unconverted notes remain outstanding, with further conversion opportunities each quarter; cash repayment can arise at maturity or under default terms. 06
Revolver and available liquidity
The $15B secured revolver was undrawn. Letters of credit used $205M, leaving $14.795B available and total cash, investments and revolver availability of $146.640B. It matures September 4, 2031, subject to an earlier maturity trigger. Borrowing rates use SOFR, a base rate or another currency benchmark plus a margin. A $5B minimum-liquidity covenant begins at December 31, 2026. 06
Liquidity, leverage and profitability ratios
Calculated from the filing’s reported USD-million figures. Balance-sheet ratios use September 30 actuals. Profitability and cash-flow margins use the nine months ended September 30, 2026. “NM” means the ratio has no useful conventional interpretation.
| Ratio / measure | Result | Formula and reading |
|---|---|---|
| Current ratio | 12.08× | Current assets $141.020B ÷ current liabilities $11.671B. |
| Quick ratio | 11.97× | (Cash + short-term investments + net receivables $7.892B) ÷ current liabilities. Excludes prepaid and other current assets. |
| Cash ratio · including short-term investments | 11.30× | $131.845B ÷ $11.671B. Cash and equivalents alone cover current liabilities 8.19×. |
| Working capital | $129.349B | Current assets − current liabilities. |
| Debt / assets · GAAP carrying basis | 85.65% | ($130.502B fair-value notes + $1.674B finance leases) ÷ $154.320B assets. Excludes operating leases. |
| Debt / assets · principal basis | 5.10% | $7.877B debt principal + finance leases ÷ $154.320B assets. Supplemental contractual-principal measure; excludes operating leases. |
| Total liabilities / assets | 95.05% | $146.683B ÷ $154.320B. Includes the fair-value note liability and operating leases. |
| Net cash · principal basis | $123.968B | Cash + short-term investments − $7.877B debt principal and finance leases. Excludes operating leases and future purchase commitments. |
| Debt / equity | NM | Actual permanent stockholders’ equity is a $149.873B deficit. Redeemable preferred stock of $157.510B sits outside permanent equity. |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | Not calculated: this brief does not present a conventional EBITDA measure. Company-defined adjusted operating income uses a separate definition. |
| Interest coverage | NM | GAAP operating income is negative. The outstanding rollover notes bear 0%; finance-lease interest and credit-facility fees also need to be considered when assessing financing costs. |
| GAAP operating margin · 9M | −3.79% | Operating loss −$1.260B ÷ revenue $33.242B. |
| GAAP net margin · 9M | −312.97% | Net loss −$104.039B ÷ revenue $33.242B. Fair-value charges on financing instruments materially affect this measure. |
| Operating cash-flow margin · 9M | 19.76% | Operating cash flow $6.569B ÷ revenue $33.242B. Collections, supplier payments and deferred revenue affect timing. |
How to read the ratios. The notes’ conversion rights produce a $130.502B fair-value liability on $6.203B of principal. Both measurements matter when assessing the capital structure. Near-term liquidity ratios also omit most future compute spending: the filing describes approximately $900.9B of aggregate contractual commitments across its disclosed categories and expects $70.7B of payments over the 12 months following September 30, 2026, including $4.2B subject to conditions or termination rights. Payment timing, delivery conditions and termination rights affect that exposure. 06
How the proposed IPO changes the balance sheet
At the $74 midpoint, the filing’s pro forma as adjusted capitalization shows $212.684B of cash and short-term investments, $110.873B of convertible notes at fair value, and $108.089B of permanent stockholders’ equity. Preferred-stock conversions and partial note conversion change the capital structure; Amazon’s ownership cap leaves rollover notes outstanding. These are offering assumptions. The ratios above retain the actual September 30 basis throughout. See the capitalization bridge for the share-count basis. 06
Source: November 10 S-1/A No. 2, Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements of Operations and Cash Flows; Note 7 (leases); Note 9 (convertible notes and revolver); MD&A “Liquidity and Capital Resources,” “Outstanding Notes” and “Contractual Obligations”; and “Capitalization.” Ratios and principal-basis subtotals are Portfolio ThinkTank calculations. 06
October operating update. The latest filing puts run-rate revenue at $81B as of October 31, up $10B from September. The metric annualizes recent revenue-generating activity using the company’s methodology. Realized Q3 revenue remains $17.0B, TTM revenue $35.3B, and Q3 × 4 $67.8B. Consumption patterns affect how much of the run rate becomes future GAAP revenue. 06
Annual scale and the 2030 forecast
Underwriter conflict. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley jointly lead the IPO and act as representatives of the underwriting syndicate. Goldman has a financial interest in completing the offering. Its private model has not been made available here for independent review. The same reporting says the model projects negative annual free cash flow until 2030. Treat $685B as a reported analyst scenario with substantial execution assumptions. 0677
How large is the business today?
Peer rows use trailing revenue, rounded. Salesforce ends July, Adobe August, and the others September 2026. YTD pace = nine-month sales × 4/3. Q3 pace = quarterly sales × 4. The October measure uses Anthropic’s run-rate methodology. The selected comparison is a scale reference for this peer set. 069192937189
Customers, usage and retention
Anthropic reports these measures as of September 30. NRR compares the same eligible cohort’s quarterly revenue with its revenue a year earlier, excluding Pro and Max subscribers. Remaining performance obligations rose from $10.8B in June to $13.8B in September, with roughly 75% expected to be recognized over the next 12 months. More than half of the Fortune 500 were customers at the company’s $100K annual revenue threshold. A total active-user series is unavailable in the filing. 0405
Claude monthly active user growth
Similarweb estimates 157M monthly active users of Claude’s mobile apps in August 2026, up from 9.1M a year earlier, or roughly 17×. Its published August increase is 16% month over month. These estimates cover the iOS and Android apps worldwide. 61
Bars show eight explicitly dated observations from the report’s tables. January is left blank. Source values are rounded; the year-over-year headline follows the source’s approximate 17× reading.
Claude.ai monthly unique visitors, August 2025 to August 2026. Similarweb reports +562% year over year. Visitors are deduplicated within the site. 61
On February 12, 2026, Anthropic said weekly active Claude Code users had doubled since January 1. The announcement supplies a growth rate without an absolute user count. This covers a different product scope and time window. 155
View audience observations and source pages
| Month | App MAU | Web unique visitors | Report pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2025 · year-ago reference | 9.1M | 16.8M | 5, 53 |
| Dec 2025 | 15.1M | 21.9M | 13 |
| Feb 2026 | 24.8M | 37.2M | 13 |
| Mar 2026 | 55.1M | 67M | 13 |
| Apr 2026 | 77.2M | 89.7M | 13 |
| May 2026 | 102M | 101M | 13, 55 |
| Jun 2026 | 120M | 106M | 41, 55 |
| Jul 2026 | 135M | 108M | 13, 55 |
| Aug 2026 | 157M | 111M | 18, 53, 55 |
Coverage: Similarweb pulls Google Play and App Store estimates separately and sums them; cross-store deduplication is not established. App users and web visitors can overlap, so the series remain separate. They provide no total for Claude usage across API, partner platforms, desktop and developer clients, or paid subscribers. The reviewed S-1/A supplies no company-wide MAU series. Similarweb primer, pp. 13, 18, 41, 53, 55 and 63–64. 6106
Compound growth factors
AI’s top-line opportunity compounds through more customers × more work per customer. Adoption expands the customer base. Reasoning, coding, images, video and agents expand usage within each account. The curves below show how those growth factors multiply into a larger volume of AI work. Market share and realized pricing determine how that workload translates into Anthropic’s revenue.
Definitions: work per user is measured in constant-2023 task equivalents. Its historical and future values are best guesses. Adoption uses dated ChatGPT milestones as a market proxy. The compound workload curve multiplies those two factors; a company revenue forecast also requires paid conversion, market share and pricing.
Compound growth curves
2023 = 100 · milestone snapshots through 2026; scenarios to 2033
Customer growth × usage per customer = top-line growth
All growth factors cover 2026 → 2033. Paid conversion, market share and revenue per unit of usage are held constant, so the two factors multiply into implied revenue growth.
| Scenario | Customer growthMarket proxy | Usage per customer | Implied top-line growth |
|---|
Customer growth uses the ChatGPT weekly-user adoption proxy. Usage growth divides the 2033 usage assumption by the 2026 assumption. These are scenarios for the market revenue opportunity; an Anthropic revenue forecast also needs company-specific customer, share and pricing assumptions. Totals use unrounded factors.
Edit customer growth and usage assumptions
These inputs set the two growth factors for 2026 → 2033. Usage per customer is indexed to 2023. The table converts it into growth from the selected 2026 baseline.
Capacity and efficiency assumptions
P assumes electricity can be delivered and used in the right places. Holding the AI-serving share constant makes P equal total data-center electricity growth. A rising share eases the efficiency requirement. That share includes allocation between conventional workloads, AI training and AI serving; it remains unknown. The IEA electricity outlook is a conditional consumption forecast, with no guarantee that connections or power arrive. The chart does not multiply installed compute by electricity, which would count hardware expansion twice.
Evidence, interpolation and the limits of this estimate
| Component | Public evidence | Model treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Adoption | ChatGPT: ~100M weekly users (Nov 2023), >250M (Oct 2024), >700M (Jul 2025), 1.2B (Sep 2026). 144145146 | Rounded milestone anchors, placed in annual bins. They are snapshots with differing dates and scope, rather than annual averages or deduplicated people. Future user equivalents extrapolate this proxy. Other providers are never added. |
| Depth | OpenAI: +30% messages per enterprise worker in 2025; recent consumer cohorts sent 50% more messages after six months. Anthropic’s research system used ~4× chat tokens for agents and ~15× for multi-agent work. 147148149 | Different cohorts, time windows and tasks. These demonstrate mechanisms; none establishes global useful work per user. Assumed intensity: 1× / 1.35× / 2× / 3× in 2023–26, then 15× / 60× / 180× in the three 2033 cases. |
| Installed compute | Epoch AI estimates deliveries and peak dense 8-bit compute in H100 equivalents. 151 | NVIDIA 2022+ covered vintages only; exclude incomplete quarters; assume 90 days from quarter-end delivery to installation and five-year service life. Estimated stock: ~0.94M / 3.5M / 10.7M / 21.0M H100e at end-2023/24/25 and Sep 2026. Network, memory, utilization, other chips and older vintages limit comparability. Future growth defaults to 50% yearly; this is separate from an efficiency forecast. |
| Electricity | IEA: ~415 TWh in 2024, 485 TWh in 2025 and 950 TWh forecast for 2030. AI-focused electricity is projected to triple over 2025–30. 152153 | All-data-center scope is broader than AI. Backcast 2023 at ~371 TWh using assumed 12% growth; geometrically interpolate 2025–30; 2033 defaults to 1,200 TWh. AI power share and deliverable serving capacity remain unknown. |
Revenue sensitivities. Adoption, paid conversion, workload per customer, market share and realized prices determine how compound workload growth becomes revenue. The model uses an adoption proxy and assumed work per user; those inputs retain their own evidence limits.
Anthropic’s top-line growth. Revenue compounds through customers × paid workload per customer × realized revenue per unit of work. Customer growth and deeper usage can reinforce each other over time. Anthropic’s market share determines how much of the expanding AI workload it captures. The curves show the market-level growth factors; a company revenue projection also needs paid-conversion, share and pricing assumptions.
Anthropic describes five objectives covering technical AI safety, safety practices supported by law, democracy and stability, prosperity, and broad sharing of benefits. 1105
What a PBC is
A Delaware public benefit corporation is a for-profit legal form. Directors must balance stockholders’ financial interests, the best interests of those materially affected by company conduct, and the public benefit in the charter. Delaware requires a benefit statement to stockholders at least every two years. Certified B Corp is a separate certification administered by B Lab. 3032
Is Anthropic a Certified B Corp, and why would it choose certification?
Its filings and 2026 Public Benefit Report establish its Delaware PBC status. A B Lab certification or company-specific directory entry could not be confirmed in the reviewed public sources as of November 12. The company has not explained a decision about pursuing certification in those sources. B Lab certification is voluntary and requires an additional assessment and verification process. The disclosed mission mechanisms to assess are the charter, the trust’s board rights and the public-benefit reporting. 06838182
| Who | Decision power | Practical consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Management and board | Executives run operations. Directors set strategy and apply the PBC balancing duty. | Decisions on releases, safety spending, and infrastructure sit with management under board oversight. 0530 |
| Long-Term Benefit Trust · Class T | The trust generally elects or removes a majority of authorized board seats through one share. Trustees vote as a body. | Influence runs through director selection. One specified Class T seat has a nominating committee process and a Class E vote when applicable. 051133 |
| Founder LLC · Class F | One share carries 50.1% of votes on general matters and participates with Class A in electing non-T directors. | The voting percentage adjusts for new general voting shares. Founders cannot exercise the trust’s board election power through the general vote. 0511 |
| Public Class A and employee Class E | Class A has one vote per share. Class E has limited governance votes, including the specified T seat process and certain trust changes. | Class A participates in the economics. Class E is a limited governance instrument and receives no dividends or residual participation. 0511 |
Who can change the mission?
The mission is in the charter. Under the filed post-IPO charter and Delaware’s ordinary amendment process, an Article III change generally starts with board approval and then goes to the stockholders entitled to vote, subject to any applicable class or transaction approvals. Article XI lists special voting rules for specified charter sections and leaves Article III outside that list. Inference from those provisions: the trust can influence the board decision through its directors, and Class F can dominate the ordinary stockholder vote. A change to the trust or its Class T powers is a separate question. 1131
How the trust protections can be changed
The S-1/A describes a route using 80% of the authorized board and 80% of sitting trustees, with rounding rules. Other routes require separate founder, employee, and Class A approvals while Class F remains outstanding. After Class F ends, the alternative route can require 85% of outstanding Class A. Specific actions and class protections determine which path applies. 0511
Share classes, authorization and issuance
| Class | Authorized on Sep 30 | Proposed post-IPO authorization | Issued / offered and rights |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 10.9B | 300B | 2.2B issued and outstanding on Sep 30. One vote per share and full economics. Class A is the offered security. |
| N | 7.1B | 100B | 30.6M issued and outstanding on Sep 30. Equal economic participation with Class A. Generally nonvoting. |
| T | 1 | 1 | One issued to the trust. Director election and special rights. No residual economic participation. |
| F | 0 | 1 | One share to be issued just before completion to Founder LLC. 50.1% of general voting power. |
| E | 0 | 30B | No shares assumed outstanding at completion in the capitalization table. Limited governance votes for eligible employees when issued. |
| Preferred | 1.0B | 30B | 853.4M issued and outstanding on Sep 30. Existing preferred converts into A or N as specified at closing. The capitalization table assumes zero preferred outstanding afterward. |
Authorization is the charter ceiling. September share counts precede the October fund issuance and IPO conversions. The November 10 pro forma bridge now supplies legal A and N outstanding totals and an expanded diluted basis at the $74 midpoint. 0611
Does Class N convert at the IPO? Existing Class N generally remains Class N at closing. A qualifying transfer can convert it one-for-one into A, including a registered offering, open-market sale or eligible unaffiliated transfer, subject to charter conditions. Certain notes and preferred securities separately convert into N around closing. That can expand the economic share count before any N-to-A transfer. 0511
Environmental, social and governance considerations
Environmental
Data center growth raises electricity, water, grid, and siting questions. Contract value alone gives no estimate of emissions or electricity consumed. Assess capacity, utilization, and power sourcing alongside spend. 06
Social
The Public Benefit Fund received 846.8M Class N shares, equal to 5% on the specified June diluted basis assuming full Amazon-note conversion. The board can authorize additional grants of up to 2% on a specified diluted basis at successive 50% share-price milestones, subject to trading-price tests. 053435
Lockups and employee equity
Initial public float is only the first slice of available supply. The draft underwriting terms set up several sale windows, with details and share quantities still subject to the final prospectus. 06
Explore the share-supply timeline alongside the IPO pricing and demand models.
| Holder / event | Proposed treatment | What to check |
|---|---|---|
| Eligible non-founder insiders | Up to 10% at the specified first-day window and an additional 35% at the specified FY26-results event. | Eligibility, holdings measurement date, and shares actually sold. |
| Standard group · early releases | 6% on each of days 27 and 48, then 7% on each of days 62 and 76. An additional 12.5% at the specified FY26-results event, then 9.5% on each of five specified dates after those results. | Each percentage applies to the defined covered holdings, with conditions. The prospectus date starts the day count. |
| Standard group | Earlier of the specified second full trading day after Q1 2027 results and the 180-day deadline. | Confirm which shares are covered and the exact date and time. |
| Holders above the specified 0.5% threshold | Generally Q3 2027 results / 365 days, with staged releases of 1.8% at each of days 27 and 48 and 2.1% at each of days 62 and 76, plus subsequent earnings-linked tranches. | Apply the holder’s agreement and full schedule. Eligibility to sell does not establish an actual sale. |
| Founders | Generally Q3 2027 results / 365 days. Up to 29% may be transferred at the earlier specified Q1-results / 180-day event. | IPO sales are excepted. This 29% provision creates a potential supply event before the final lockup expiry. |
| Concurrent Class N placement | The private shares carry resale restrictions under securities law, with no underwriter lockup or company market standoff. | Registration rights, exemption eligibility and holding periods govern access to the market. |
Summary of the prospectus and underwriting sections. Earnings release definitions, exceptions, and underwriter waivers can affect timing. 06
Complete percentage schedule for the larger-holder group
For the specified holders above 0.5% of pre-offering fully diluted shares, the staged allowances are 1.8% each on days 27 and 48; 2.1% each on days 62 and 76; 3.75% at the FY2026-results gate; 2.85% each at FY2026 results +13, +27, +41, +55 and +69 days; 4.2% at the earlier Q1-results / day-180 gate; 5.6% each at Q1 results +34, +48, +62 and +76 days; 7% at the Q2-results gate; and 6.3% each at Q2 results +27, +41, +55, +69 and +83 days. The applicable Q3-results / day-365 terminal expiry governs any remainder. Each allowance uses the agreement’s defined reference holdings. Earnings gates use the second full Nasdaq trading day; numbered offsets use calendar days and the contractual trading-day adjustment. 06
Employee plans and dilution
The filed 2026 Equity Incentive Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) govern awards and eligible purchases. The old plan ceases new grants when the new plan takes effect. As of September 30, the filing lists options on 1.8B Class A shares at a weighted average exercise price of $2.91. Vesting, exercise, tax settlement, and the IPO share count determine how much reaches float.
The new incentive reserve begins with 1.921B shares plus carryover and returns; the ESPP begins with 128.0M. Annual increases and future grants can add claims. These ungranted pools stay outside the outstanding-award totals in the chart. The separate Class E governance instrument carries no economic participation. 0611
VCs and strategic holders
Amazon/AWS and Google combine large economic stakes with long-term compute supply. NVIDIA, AMD, Broadcom, Micron, Microsoft and TSMC join the concurrent placement. The roster also spans venture firms, growth funds, sovereign investors and asset managers. The table below quantifies positions where the filing supplies shares or a defined new investment. 06
Who has an economic stake?
Sovereign and state-backed capital
Investment cost, ownership and new IPO allocations have separate evidence. The ranges below are explicitly illustrative; current total stakes remain unverified.
| Investor / capital source | Disclosed participation | Investment amount · US$ | Ownership reference / illustrative range |
|---|---|---|---|
| GICSingapore · sovereign investment manager | Disclosed Series F; led G with Coatue (Feb 2026); co-led H (May 2026). 11645 | Reported · Oct 23 More than $4.5B invested cumulatively, per Bloomberg. Individual round tickets unconfirmed. 102 | Reported · Oct 23 ~1% of Anthropic. 102 Best guess0.5%–1.5% sensitivity around that historical reference. Post-IPO stake unknown. |
| TemasekSingapore · state-owned investment company | Disclosed | Unknown Individual checks and cumulative investment undisclosed in the reviewed sources. | Unknown Current shares and ownership range cannot be established from participation alone. |
| Qatar Investment AuthorityQatar · sovereign wealth fund | Disclosed Series F (Sep 2025), G (Feb 2026) and H (May 2026). QIA confirms three consecutive rounds. 117 | Unknown Individual checks and cumulative investment undisclosed in the reviewed sources. | Unknown Current shares and ownership range cannot be established from participation alone. |
| MGXAbu Dhabi · state-backed AI investor | Disclosed | Reported proposal · Feb 10 Bloomberg reported talks to invest hundreds of millions ahead of G. Completed check and cumulative total remain unknown. 118 | Best guess 0.07%–0.20% for an assumed G ticket only, at that round’s valuation. Total stake unknownEarlier holdings, H purchases and later dilution are unquantified. |
How the illustrative ownership ranges are calculated
- GIC: apply an assumed ±50% sensitivity to Bloomberg’s historical ~1% reference: 0.5%–1.5%. The width is an editorial assumption, with no statistical confidence level. The report supplies no reconciled share denominator.
- MGX: assume a $500M Series G check with a ±50% sensitivity ($250M–$750M), using the reported proposed ticket scale as context. Divide by the disclosed $380B post-money round valuation to obtain ~0.07%–0.20% newly purchased at that financing, assuming the same economic terms. The $500M midpoint is an editorial assumption. A completed check of that size has not been confirmed. 44118
Both ranges describe historical references or conditional tickets. Current or post-IPO ownership requires investor-level shares, conversions, follow-on purchases, transfers and the applicable share denominator. Cumulative dollars invested cannot be divided by today’s valuation to recover ownership. Temasek and QIA lack a sourced individual amount or stake anchor, so their ranges remain unknown.
Round totals describe all investors together. Cash invested differs from the current value of a holding. The $26B concurrent IPO placement names seven strategic corporate buyers; public-offering allocations to these four sovereign investors remain undisclosed. 06
What about SoftBank? It is a Japanese listed investment group. Its announced 2026 $30B follow-on investment concerns OpenAI. SoftBank is absent from Anthropic’s named concurrent-placement buyers; an Anthropic investment or public-IPO allocation was not verified in the reviewed sources. 11506
| Investor | Disclosed position / commitment | Estimated economic share | Value or new funding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon / AWS | About 1.9B Class N after closing, plus about 1.6B N equivalents from rollover notes. | 14.7% on the basic midpoint basis. Rollover shares enter broader dilution. | About $134B–$150B for the initial N holding at $70–$78. |
| Alphabet / Google | About 1.8B N after the $10B private purchase at $74. | 13.7% on the basic midpoint basis. | About $125B–$140B at $70–$78, holding midpoint shares fixed. |
| NVIDIA | $10B concurrent purchase | About 1.0%–1.1% incremental | $10B new funding |
| AMD | $2.5B concurrent purchase | About 0.25%–0.27% incremental | $2.5B new funding |
| Broadcom | $1B concurrent purchase; infrastructure and financing arrangements separately disclosed. | About 0.10%–0.11% incremental | $1B new funding |
| Microsoft | $1B concurrent purchase; Azure hosting is a separate commercial relationship. | About 0.10%–0.11% incremental | $1B new funding |
| Micron | $1B concurrent purchase | About 0.10%–0.11% incremental | $1B new funding |
| TSMC | $0.5B concurrent purchase | About 0.05% incremental | $0.5B new funding |
| Spark Capital | The related-party tables disclose about $777M invested across six rounds from Series C through H, including $440M in H. | Total current shareholding is undisclosed. Historical purchases can be affected by transfers and later financing. | $777M of disclosed purchases; reported stake value below. |
Amazon and Google counts are from the ownership-risk disclosure, rather than the voting-stockholder table. Basic economic percentages use about 13.1B A+N shares at $74. Incremental-placement ranges divide the fixed cash ticket by the $70–$78 price and a corresponding basic denominator, holding other conversions fixed. They measure only the new purchase. Existing holdings can add exposure. Voting rights follow the share class. 06
Venture and sovereign stakes · reported estimates
Reported · October 23 Bloomberg estimates, before the latest offering terms. 102
| Investor | Reported stake or value | Investment context |
|---|---|---|
| ICONIQ | ~$17B at the $965B private valuation; ~1.8% implied. | More than $6B invested. |
| Menlo Ventures | ~$14B; ~1.5% implied and reported as below 2%. | More than $1B invested. |
| Sequoia Capital | Roughly 1%. | ~$3B invested, starting in 2026. |
| GIC | Investment, stake reference and illustrative range above. | |
| Lightspeed | Below 2%. | Backed Series D and later rounds. |
| Spark Capital | ~$7B at the private valuation; ~0.7% implied. | Filing separately identifies ~$777M across six rounds. 06 |
Bloomberg cites unnamed sources. Implied stakes use the $965B private valuation. Post-IPO share reconciliation remains unavailable; strategic holdings above use a separate, filed basic-share basis. 102
Venture, growth and institutional roster
Early and venture investors. Spark Capital, Menlo Ventures and Lightspeed appear across the company’s funding history. Series H lead group. Altimeter, Dragoneer, Greenoaks and Sequoia led; Capital Group, Coatue, D1, GIC, ICONIQ and XN co-led. Other named participants. AMP PBC, Baillie Gifford, Blackstone, Brookfield, D.E. Shaw Ventures, DST Global, Fidelity, General Catalyst, Insight Partners, Jane Street, Lightspeed, MGX, NTTVC, NX1, Situational Awareness, T. Rowe Price and Temasek. Earlier rounds also name BlackRock funds, Goldman Sachs Alternatives, Morgan Stanley Investment Management, Qatar Investment Authority, Ontario Teachers’ and TPG. 4142434445
Individual tickets and current share counts for most of this group are undisclosed. Round participation establishes an investment relationship. A defensible current stake range would require investor-level shares, follow-on purchases, transfers and dilution. Reported venture estimates appear above with their dates and limitations. 0645102
The categories overlap. The 12-month and 2030 windows sit inside the total. The conditional portion cuts across payment years. The filing separately estimates $150B–$175B of potential variable arrangements outside the aggregate, based on delivery and other conditions. 06
| Partner | Compute or distribution | Financing / equity context |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon / AWS | At least $110B over May 2026–April 2036. Bedrock distribution and Trainium capacity. | $6.2B principal of Amazon notes outstanding Sep 30. Closing conversion into N is subject to an ownership cap, with some amounts potentially rolling over. 0536 |
| Alphabet / Google | At least $121.3B under amended hosting terms. Additional TPU arrangements are estimated at $125B–$150B and excluded from the fixed aggregate. | Preferred/economic exposure plus a financing arrangement. Its 14.99% contractual ownership limit under the specified NPA measures as-converted economic capitalization. Class N generally carries no general vote. 06 |
| SpaceXAI | Up to $120.5B through 2029 under the disclosed GPU arrangements, with cancellation rights after initial periods. | Compute supplier exposure. The contract ceiling measures a purchase commitment. 0537 |
| NVIDIA / Microsoft | NVIDIA GPU ecosystem and Azure/Foundry distribution. Microsoft hosting commitments rise to at least $47.2B under February and November 2026 amendments. | The concurrent placement specifies $10B from NVIDIA and $1B from Microsoft. These new share purchases have their own conditions. 06 |
| Other partners | Anthropic Direct separates accelerator procurement from dedicated data center capacity. AMD, Broadcom and other vendors support hardware, leases, and deployment. | AMD's initial tranche could exceed $20B if fully procured. Leases, financing and delivery terms determine cash timing. 06 |
Partner amounts have different scopes and often sit inside company totals. Adding every announced contract risks double counting. Convertible note carrying value and principal measure different things. 06
Data centers · ownership, rent and lock-in
The compound growth factors show how a growing customer base and deeper usage within each account can expand the revenue opportunity.
Anthropic uses a mix of cloud capacity, equipment leases and dedicated facilities operated by partners. Under Anthropic Direct, it separates the purchase or lease of accelerators from data-center space and power. This gives it more control of the hardware and deployment stack while counterparties build or operate much of the physical infrastructure. 06
| Layer | What Anthropic buys | How binding is it? | When economics improve or deteriorate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud hosting | AWS minimum $110B over 2026–36; Google at least $121.3B through 2033; Microsoft $47.2B–$49.2B through 2033. | Minimum-spend obligations generally survive low usage. AWS and Google have shortfall true-ups, subject to contract exceptions. | Reserved capacity can support growth. Underutilization leaves spend obligations against less revenue. |
| Accelerator equipment | Five-year Broadcom equipment leases with about $161.2B of rent excluding interest. | Non-cancelable during the term except specified default rights. Payment normally starts when hardware is ready for service and can begin earlier if facilities are delayed. | High utilization spreads fixed cost. Idle or outdated hardware, power delays and faster rival hardware can weaken returns. |
| Equipment and facility leases awaiting start | About $451.2B of undiscounted lease obligations, primarily compute and infrastructure, had yet to commence at September 30. This includes more than real estate. | Expected starts are 2026–28; terms range up to 20 years, averaging about ten. Counterparty delivery conditions vary. | Site control and predictable power can help at scale. Long terms expose Anthropic to demand and technology changes. |
| Flexible third-party compute | Shorter contracts and the SpaceXAI capacity arrangements, alongside Lambda, Nscale and other suppliers. | Some SpaceXAI commitments can be canceled after initial periods. Other supplier contracts limit cancellation to breach or missed delivery conditions. | Flexibility helps absorb bursts and bridge supply. Short-term capacity can cost more per unit. |
The $451.2B total for leases awaiting commencement covers compute and infrastructure. Equipment can overlap broader infrastructure arrangements, so these rows should be read alongside the aggregate commitment totals. 06
The investor test. Compare delivered capacity, utilization and cost per completed task with realized customer prices and demand. Anthropic wins economically when workloads fill capacity and efficiency improves faster than prices fall. It loses when minimum bills, financing and obsolescence grow faster than profitable usage. These are scenario implications of the disclosed contract structure. 06
Which valuation denominator?
| Basis at $74 | Economic shares | Equity value | Included items |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal A + N outstanding | 13.1B | $968.4B | 7.4B Class A + 5.7B Class N after the base IPO and placement. Includes the fund’s legal N shares. |
| Consolidated A + N outstanding | 12.2B | $905.7B | 7.4B Class A + 4.8B Class N; excludes 846.8M subsidiary-held Public Benefit Fund shares while they remain within the consolidated group. |
| Expanded diluted bridge | 18.0B | $1.33T | 7.4B A + 7.8B N + 1.7B net options + 1.1B RSUs, from page 24. |
| Public base offering | 825M | $61.1B gross | The shares offered to public investors. Represents 6.3% of legal A+N shares or 4.6% of the expanded diluted basis. |
| Concurrent Class N issue | 351.4M | $26B gross | Private strategic financing at the IPO price. Included in the post-deal denominators above. |
The expanded bridge adds rollover notes, acquisitions and holdbacks, matching obligations and benefit-fund shares, and applies a treasury-stock adjustment to options. Consolidated accounting excludes the fund’s 846.8M shares while held by the wholly owned subsidiary. T, F and E carry governance rights and contribute no economic shares. The sensitivity at $70 and $78 holds the midpoint bridge fixed; final conversions, option adjustments and private share counts can change. 0609
Compare the selected valuation with public companies and historical IPOs in the Comparisons chapter.
Private and adjacent references
OpenAI announced $852B post-money and $122B committed in March 2026. Mistral announced €11.7B post-money on €1.7B raised in September 2025. xAI sits within public SpaceX following the combination. Each valuation reflects its own date and security terms. 474849
Funding at the midpoint
Public gross value is $61.1B, consisting of $59.3B issuer shares and $1.8B selling-holder shares. With $26B of private N financing, company gross funding is $85.3B. The filing estimates $84.6B net to Anthropic, or $93.7B with the full option, at $74. About $3.8B is intended for RSU-related tax payments. 06
Previous funding
Capital raised in each round
Post-money valuation references
Linear bars use separate scales for selected cash amounts and valuation references. Green valuations: company-announced E–H post-money figures. Copper valuations: Forge’s A–D estimates derived from corporate filings, with their own record dates. In particular, the B valuation reference is February 2023, later than the April 2022 $580M announcement. D cash aggregates the specified D-1/D-3 sales over January–May 2024; the valuation uses Forge’s March 2024 D-2/D-3 reference. Strategic notes and other financings are outside this selected cash series. 3940410642434445110
Early valuation sources, dates and limits
| Round | Forge valuation reference | How to read it |
|---|---|---|
| A | About $623M · May 28, 2021 | Third-party post-money estimate. The company announcement supplies the selected $124M raise. |
| B | About $4.0B · February 3, 2023 | A later B financing record. Its valuation and financing scope differ from the April 2022 announcement. |
| C | About $4.6B · May 23, 2023 | Rounded from Forge’s $4.55B C-1/C-2 record. |
| D | About $18.4B · March 27, 2024 | Later D-2/D-3 reference. Forge also lists an earlier October 2023 D-1 value of about $14.6B. |
These are data-provider estimates, reviewed November 12, with round/tranche and capitalization assumptions that can differ from other databases. 110
Still unknown: A fully reconciled, issuer-confirmed A–D post-money series on one consistent diluted-share basis was not verified. The chart preserves the source dates and estimation status. It should not be used to infer a split-adjusted investor return.
Earlier rounds and strategic tranches
| Round / tranche | Date | Amount | Valuation context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Series A | May 2021 | $124M | Company announcement gives the amount. |
| Series B | Apr 2022 | $580M | Company announcement gives the amount. |
| Series C | May 2023 | $450M | Spark led. Company announcement gives the amount. |
| Series D-1 and D-3 sales | Jan–May 2024 | $1.2B | Prospectus discloses sale proceeds across the two series. |
| First Amazon note package | Sep 2023–Mar 2024 | $4B total | Strategic convertible financing. Separate from preferred round pricing. |
Series A–D post-money values are omitted where the cited primary source supplies no like-for-like number. The aggregate capital raised measure includes instruments beyond this selected round history. 39404105
Private marketplaces and current exposures
| Route | What it holds | What to verify |
|---|---|---|
| Forge secondary market | Direct shares or a vehicle interest depending on the listing. Live Anthropic pricing requires platform access. | Class and split basis, matched trade versus quote, fees, transfer consent, and remaining lockup. May Series H is a disclosed financing mark. 5045 |
| ARK Venture Fund (ARKVX) | Interval fund with Anthropic among portfolio holdings. The manager reported 6.40% at May 31, 2026 in its IPO-wave material. | Current holdings, mark, repurchase window and liquidity. The dated weight can move. 5152 |
| Fundrise Innovation Fund (NYSE · VCX) | Listed closed-end fund. Its June 30 economic-issuer table put Anthropic at more than 20% of net assets, with some exposure held through co-investment vehicles. | Current NAV, holdings, fees and the market-price premium or discount. Buying VCX gives portfolio exposure, with its own pricing and liquidity. 8788 |
| Amazon / Alphabet / Microsoft / NVIDIA | Listed shares with varying strategic exposure and diversified businesses. | Check the underlying stake, potential dilution, commercial obligations, and how material those are to each company. 053836 |
| IPO order or Nasdaq purchase | Class A through an eligible broker allocation or open-market trade once the stock lists. | Final offer terms, broker eligibility, allocation, and opening price. 0515 |
Monetization and consumption
9M 2026 mix. Usage includes token-metered activity across channels and first-party products. Subscription plans serve individuals and businesses. Cloud marketplace revenue was 44% of total 9M revenue and overlaps these categories. 06
Routes to customers
- Direct and enterprise. Claude Platform API, negotiated capacity, Claude.ai, Claude Code and Cowork.
- Cloud. AWS Bedrock, Google Cloud’s AI platform and Microsoft Foundry.
- Usage economics. Token charges vary by model, caching and batch eligibility. Compare spend per completed task as well as posted token rates. 0553
The November 10 move into office work
Anthropic introduced Claude Sheets, Whiteboards and Data, alongside upgraded interactive connectors that bring partner applications into the Claude workspace. They extend existing document and slide creation. Claude Meetings is announced as coming soon. The investment question is how much office work shifts into an AI workspace, and how much incumbents retain through their installed base. 84
Revenue pool. Microsoft’s FY2026 Microsoft 365 Commercial and Consumer product families generated about $111B combined, a broader category than the core Office apps alone. Alphabet includes Workspace in Google Cloud, whose Q3 revenue was $30.7B; a Workspace-only figure is undisclosed. OpenAI already sells business access alongside its consumer product, so competition for enterprise workflows is established. 858697
Model price and capability reference
| Provider / model | Typical use | Input / 1M | Output / 1M | Coding FrontierSWE v2 | Workflows AutomationBench |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic · Fable 5.2 | Demanding technical and research tasks | $8 | $40 | 69.9% | 51.4% |
| Anthropic · Opus 5.5 | Complex coding and knowledge work | $4 | $20 | 62.3% | 42.5% |
| Anthropic · Sonnet 5.5 | General work with speed and cost sensitivity | $2 | $10 | — | — |
| Anthropic · Haiku 5.5 | High-volume extraction and routing | $0.10* | $0.50* | — | — |
| OpenAI · GPT-6 Astra | Demanding reasoning, coding and research | $10 | $50 | 65.5% | 41.4% |
| OpenAI · GPT-6.1 Sol | Complex work with lower token cost | $2 | $10 | — | — |
| Google · Gemini 4 Carbon | Reasoning and enterprise agents | $2† | $10† | 61.2% | 53.9% |
Standard direct API prices checked November 12, USD per million tokens, before caching, batch and tool fees. *Haiku prices become $0.50 input / $2.50 output above 100K input tokens. †Google’s introductory prices run through November 30, then become $4 / $20. OpenAI applies higher rates above its long-input threshold. 539596
The two benchmark columns use Anthropic’s November 9 cross-vendor evaluation table. Its harness, effort and selection of tasks affect results. A dash means the cited table supplies no score for that model. Scores do not measure customer ROI or total task cost. 94
How to read the benchmark columns
FrontierSWE v2 tests software engineering. AutomationBench tests business workflows. The latest Fable release improves both measures relative to Fable 5.1, with the table showing one snapshot across competing models. System cards explain model-specific settings and safeguards. 9456
Websites and traffic
Claude.ai serves end users; Anthropic.com carries company and research material; Claude Platform Docs serves developers.
Periods: full quarters through Q2 2026; Q3 2026 includes July–August. Visits are divided by observed months. Share uses each period’s combined visits across Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok and Perplexity. The 9.6% headline is August alone.
View observations and calculations
| Period | Months | Visits | Monthly average | Six-site share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 2025 | 3 | 309M | 103.0M | 1.54% |
| Q3 2025 | 3 | 431M | 143.7M | 1.92% |
| Q4 2025 | 3 | 550M | 183.3M | 2.23% |
| Q1 2026 | 3 | 1,110M | 370.0M | 4.10% |
| Q2 2026 | 3 | 2,720M | 906.7M | 9.04% |
| Q3 2026 QTD (July–August) | 2 | 1,920M | 960.0M | 9.78% |
Source: Similarweb primer, pp. 17–18 and 63–64. Worldwide desktop and mobile web; published totals are rounded. Web visits cover repeated activity and have separate definitions from users, API usage and revenue. Corporate-site and documentation traffic series are unavailable in this source. 61
AI marketplace share
Economic Index · low penetration and the growth runway
Business AI adoption is still early
Anthropic’s Economic Index cites Census Bureau data showing that business AI adoption more than doubled over roughly two years. Even then, about nine in ten U.S. firms reported no AI use in producing goods or services. Anthropic describes enterprise adoption as being in its early stages. 108
The survey measured AI use in production during the preceding two weeks. It covers AI broadly. These are dated 2025 observations; employee use and informal experimentation can be more widespread.
Low penetration leaves room for sustained growth
A small adoption base gives AI demand two paths to grow: more businesses start using it, and existing customers expand it across more workflows. New departments, additional tasks and deeper integration can increase spending within an account as the customer base expands.
Investor reading. This supports a thesis that strong growth can continue for years as AI spreads through the economy. Anthropic’s share of that growth will depend on customer value, implementation, pricing and competition. The adoption data alone cannot establish how long its recent revenue growth rates will last.
The adoption figures come from the Census Bureau’s Business Trends and Outlook Survey, as cited in Anthropic’s September 15, 2025 report. They measure the share of firms reporting AI production use at that time. 108
Still unknown: These figures do not establish current business AI penetration, Claude’s penetration of all businesses, future spending per adopter or the duration of Anthropic’s recent growth rates.
| Source | Signal | Denominator |
|---|---|---|
| Anthropic Economic Index | Business AI adoption context and observed Claude usage by task. | Census survey respondents for business adoption; sampled Claude interactions for task usage. Each has its own denominator. 108 |
| Ramp AI Index | Anthropic at 60.5% of tracked AI token spend in the week ending Oct 23, 2026. | Businesses and token spending observed on Ramp. Time window and customer mix affect the reading. 58 |
| Menlo Ventures 2025 survey | Estimated 40% of enterprise LLM spend in 2025. | Survey and usage-based estimate for enterprise LLMs. Menlo is an Anthropic investor. 60 |
| Similarweb IPO research | 9.6% of measured traffic in its six-site set. | Web visits. Users, paid subscriptions, enterprise API spend and revenue each require separate measurements. 61 |
There is no consistent global AI market-share denominator across these datasets. Size consumer subscriptions, enterprise tokens, and cloud distribution separately when building a market model.
Company profile
Headquarters. San Francisco Bay Area. The filing lists 548 Market Street, PMB 90375, San Francisco as the principal executive office address. Size. Approximately 5,300 employees at Sep 30, 2026 versus roughly 940 at Dec 31, 2024. The company reports over $6.6M in TTM revenue per employee. See customer scale and sites and traffic. 06
Orientation versus OpenAI
OpenAI’s consumer reach makes ChatGPT a familiar starting point for workplace adoption. Its November 2025 announcement cited more than 800M weekly users and 1M paying business customers. Anthropic’s commercial emphasis centers on developers, enterprise consumption, Claude Code and cloud distribution. Its nine-month sales were 79% consumption-based. Both sell to consumers and businesses, with different routes into the customer relationship. 9706
Employee growth
Executive team
Dario Amodei is CEO and a co-founder. Daniela Amodei is president, chair and a co-founder. Krishna Rao is CFO. Other co-founders are Tom Brown (compute), Jared Kaplan (science), Jack Clark (policy), Sam McCandlish, and Christopher Olah. 06
The filed post-offering board table assigns Hastings, Liddell and Narasimhan to Class T, and Dario Amodei, Daniela Amodei and Yasmin Razavi to the Class A/F electorate. Class T generally elects a majority of authorized seats. 06
Average pay and personnel expense
Q3 personnel expense was $1.7B, including about $1.1B of stock-based compensation. Dividing by end-quarter headcount gives roughly $323K per employee for the quarter. The residual after equity expense is roughly $121K per end-quarter employee. Both are expense ratios. Salaries, bonuses, benefits, headcount timing and accounting charges can differ from individual cash pay. 06
| Risk | Transmission to economics | Signal to track |
|---|---|---|
| Customer lock-in and switching | Workflow integrations, evaluation suites and compliance create switching costs. Multi-model routing makes it easier to divert individual workloads. | Retention by cohort, share of tokens routed to alternatives, renewal commitments and spend concentration. 0559 |
| Open-weight models | Self-hosted models can substitute for paid APIs on narrower tasks. Total cost includes serving, engineering, updates and reliability. | Quality and latency on the same workload at all-in cost. 06 |
| Model pricing | Discounts and lower rates compress revenue per token. Higher volumes and more valuable tasks can offset lower unit prices. | The amendment attributes about $600M of offset to lower prices and discounts in the Q2-to-Q3 revenue bridge. Track realized price and cost per task. 0553 |
| Valuation and float | A high sales multiple increases sensitivity to slower growth or weaker margins. Thin float and unlocks can amplify price moves. | Final price and capital structure, operating margin, conversion releases, and real aftermarket turnover. 06 |
| Rogue AI and deployment controls | Loss of control, misuse, or security incidents could affect deployment, reputation and regulation. Policy thresholds can also change the rollout of capable models. | The amendment says future models may soon reach its AI-accelerated R&D threshold. No current model had been designated as crossing it in the filing. Follow risk reports and evaluations. 053556 |
| Customer and cloud concentration | Top five customers accounted for about 25% of 9M revenue, with no single customer above 10%. Cloud marketplaces accounted for 44% of 9M sales and 52% of Sep 30 net receivables. | End-customer concentration, channel mix, collections, and dependency on large suppliers and financiers. 06 |
| Capacity and cash commitments | Capacity becomes available on a schedule that may lead demand. Delivery conditions, lease obligations, and supplier concentration determine flexibility. | Delivered capacity, utilization, cost per inference, and the next 12 months of payments versus operating cash generation. 06 |
| Compound growth assumptions | Customer adoption and work per customer multiply into a larger workload. The top-line outcome depends on paid usage, market share and realized pricing. | Compound growth factors: customer-cohort growth, paid work per customer, consumption revenue, realized prices and market share. Industry workload per user remains an estimate. |
| Governance and public benefit | Founder voting and trust board rights constrain outside control. The PBC mandate can shape deployment and spending choices. | Board composition, benefit statements, trust changes, and deployment decisions under the safety policy. 110530 |
Options, futures and other exposure
The cash stock listing and each derivative product follow separate exchange or dealer processes.
Listed options · earliest November 23
Options could start Monday, November 23 after a November 19 debut, subject to qualification and exchange approval under Nasdaq ISE’s large-IPO rule. No ANT listing notice or chain was found as of November 12. Standard contracts usually cover 100 shares. 9963
Kalshi and Robinhood event contracts
| Route | Verified product or access | What the holder receives |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | An Anthropic IPO-announcement market exists, with contracts on confirmation before specified dates. | A binary event payout under the market rules. The contract can resolve on SEC effectiveness, IPO pricing or an exchange assigning a ticker. It can therefore settle before the stock’s first trade. 100 |
| Robinhood Derivatives | Its event-contract disclosure describes access to contracts cleared through ForecastEx or Kalshi. An Anthropic-specific Robinhood listing was not confirmed in reviewed public pages. | Access depends on the contract offered in the account. Robinhood’s disclosure describes these CFTC-regulated products as cleared swaps. Read the selected contract’s settlement rule. 101 |
| Exposure to ANT itself | IPO shares, listed stock, equity options when introduced, or a separately listed single-stock future. | These instruments have returns tied to the security or its price. An IPO-date event contract pays on its defined event and conveys no equity ownership. 069965100 |
James Damschroder’s thesis
My investment judgments and forecasts, informed by operating an AI fintech business. Author bio · A.I. Investing: Iconoclastic Predictions
- A strong IPO. I expect broad investor demand and the relative scarcity of listed AI pure plays to support a strong debut.
- Extraordinary growth. In my judgment, this is the most extraordinary revenue growth story of all time: from $41M in 2023 to $35.3B of trailing revenue through September 2026. 06
- A long runway for margin expansion. I see the GPU and data-center buildout, higher utilization and incremental training efficiency putting Anthropic on a path toward sustained margin expansion. The outcome depends on capacity arriving economically and profitable demand keeping pace.
- The AI long tail. I believe the expanding range of useful AI tasks can sustain significant, durable growth and allow Anthropic to earn its high multiple over time. The compound growth factors link customer adoption and deeper usage to the revenue opportunity. Alphabet and Meta illustrate how a large, expanding opportunity can sustain growth for years. This is an analogy and a forecast.
- Market-share peak by the end of 2027. I expect Anthropic’s share of AI revenue to peak by then. My thesis therefore depends on growth in the overall revenue pool continuing to support the company as competition broadens. The market-share datasets above have different denominators, so this forecast needs a consistent measure to be tested.
- Attention and customer lock-in. In my experience as an AI fintech operator, Claude models are strong, while their pricing may prove unsustainable against competing offers. Firms must keep customer attention and control useful workflows to retain pricing power. Anthropic is especially exposed if customers can shift those workflows or route workloads elsewhere.
- Contribution-margin risk beneath the growth. I expect frontier labs to navigate most of the attention and lock-in challenges. As the stakes rise, customer acquisition, retention and competitive pricing can still pressure revenue left after direct serving costs. I believe that risk sits near the heart of Anthropic’s 2026 revenue power, even alongside my longer-term margin-expansion thesis.
The forecasts and assessments in this section are James Damschroder’s views as of the last edit date. The preceding chapters provide the disclosed facts, dated third-party observations and explicit scenarios on which readers can assess them. 06107106
Sources and outline index
This November 12 investor brief incorporates the November 10 S-1/A No. 2, the company’s expected IPO timetable, current product and pricing references, and a dated market snapshot. The 20% retail target and Goldman’s 2030 model are attributed to reporting. Funding, fund holdings and survey observations carry their own dates. Figures are rounded for reading; calculations retain the underlying source precision.
Preparation and contributions
This document was prepared with significant agentic contributions from Codex and Claude. The JDZ thesis reflects James Damschroder’s views.
Company logos primarily use GSphere’s transparent assets. Where its API supplies a generic icon, transparent vector brand assets and site icons are used. Images are embedded in this standalone edition.
What remains unknown or estimated · November 13
- Compound growth factors. The growth curves uses dated ChatGPT milestones as an adoption proxy. Useful work per user, the AI-serving share of electricity, future installed capacity and hardware/model efficiency splits are explicit best guesses. Compound workload is calculated from adoption and work per user; infrastructure series have different scopes. Compound growth curves and assumptions.
- Offering and demand. Final price, the actual order book, customer allocations and the realized retail/institutional split remain pending or undisclosed. Lockup percentages do not supply the absolute shares that will actually be sold.
- Users and pay. The reviewed sources do not establish a consistent active-user/subscriber growth series or actual average employee cash pay. Customer counts and personnel-expense ratios are the available proxies.
- Early financing. A–D valuation references are attributed estimates. Issuer confirmation on one reconciled diluted-share basis remains unverified.
- Sovereign holders. GIC’s invested amount and historical stake are reported estimates. MGX’s reported proposed ticket has no confirmed completed amount. Their displayed ranges are illustrative sensitivities; Temasek and QIA amounts and ownership ranges remain unknown. Current post-IPO stakes and sovereign IPO allocations are undisclosed. Holder table and assumptions.
- ESG. Company-wide electricity consumption, emissions and water use were not verified. Contract spend and reserved capacity cannot substitute for those measures.
- Index assets. Mutual-fund and account allocations marked A are planning assumptions. Nasdaq’s managed-account total and a distinct active-benchmarked asset pool remain unquantified.
- Client reach and aftermarket buying. Provider counts use different dates and definitions. Merrill wealth-account counts, actual stock-buying eligibility, cross-platform overlap and ANT purchase intent remain unverified. Manager and custody assets are excluded from the account-demand model. The 20-session range is an editable best guess with account exclusions and discounts; cash, assets, fund flows and IPO orders are separate references. Model and source table.
- Current exposure and derivatives. Fund holding weights carry their own dates. Executable private-market quotes, an actual ANT options launch and an ANT single-stock-futures contract remain unverified.
- 01SpaceX final IPO prospectus · June 11, 2026 · base commitments and capital structurewww.sec.gov
- 02SpaceX · June 11, 2026 pricing announcement · $135 and 555,555,555 sharesir.spacex.com
- 03SpaceX · June 15, 2026 closing announcement · full option exerciseir.spacex.com
- 04Anthropic Form S-1 · 26 Oct 2026www.sec.gov
- 05Anthropic Form S-1/A No. 1 · 02 Nov 2026www.sec.gov
- 06Anthropic Form S-1/A No. 2 · 10 Nov 2026www.sec.gov
- 07Anthropic · official roadshow launch, 10 Nov 2026www.anthropic.com
- 08Investopedia via Yahoo · CNBC-reported dates and retail target, 10 Novfinance.yahoo.com
- 09Anthropic · November 10 prospectus PDF, capitalization bridge p. 24ipo.anthropic.com
- 10SEC submissions · filing chronologydata.sec.gov
- 11Anthropic proposed post-IPO charter · exhibit 3.3www.sec.gov
- 12Anthropic confidential submission announcementwww.anthropic.com
- 13IFR · reported roadshow and deal targets, Oct 2026www.ifre.com
- 14Reuters · Japanese distribution filing, 02 Novwww.investing.com
- 15SEC Investor.gov · IPO process and allocationswww.investor.gov
- 16Nasdaq · Nasdaq-100 methodologyindexes.nasdaq.com
- 17Nasdaq · assets and liquidity in the Nasdaq-100 ecosystemwww.nasdaq.com
- 18FTSE Russell · 2026 IPO fast entrywww.lseg.com
- 19FTSE Russell · IPO addition calendarwww.lseg.com
- 20FTSE Russell · 2026 reconstitution and assetswww.lseg.com
- 21S&P DJI · S&P U.S. Indices methodologywww.spglobal.com
- 22S&P DJI · mega-cap consultation decisionpress.spglobal.com
- 23S&P DJI · 2024 indexed and benchmarked assetswww.spglobal.com
- 24Invesco · QQQ September 2026 fund assetswww.invesco.com
- 25iShares · Russell 1000 ETFwww.ishares.com
- 26iShares · Russell 3000 ETFwww.ishares.com
- 27SIFMA · US equities market activitywww.sifma.org
- 28Market quote references · November 12 comparison snapshot; November 5 turnover referencewww.nasdaq.com
- 29Stock Analysis · NVIDIA average share volumestockanalysis.com
- 30Delaware Code §§ 362, 365 and 366 · public benefit corporationswww.delcode.delaware.gov
- 31Delaware Code § 242 · charter amendmentsdelcode.delaware.gov
- 32B Lab · benefit corporation and Certified B Corpwww.bcorporation.net
- 33Anthropic · Long-Term Benefit Trustwww.anthropic.com
- 34Anthropic · Public Benefit Fund, 18 Octwww.anthropic.com
- 35Anthropic · Responsible Scaling Policywww.anthropic.com
- 36Anthropic · Amazon compute expansionwww.anthropic.com
- 37Anthropic · SpaceX compute partnershipwww.anthropic.com
- 38Anthropic · NVIDIA and Microsoft partnershipwww.anthropic.com
- 39Anthropic · Series Awww.anthropic.com
- 40Anthropic · Series Bwww.anthropic.com
- 41Anthropic · Series Cwww.anthropic.com
- 42Anthropic · Series Ewww.anthropic.com
- 43Anthropic · Series Fwww.anthropic.com
- 44Anthropic · Series Gwww.anthropic.com
- 45Anthropic · Series Hwww.anthropic.com
- 46OpenAI · corporate structureopenai.com
- 47OpenAI · March 2026 roundopenai.com
- 48Mistral AI · September 2025 Series Cmistral.ai
- 49SpaceX Form 10-Q · xAI acquisition and IPOwww.sec.gov
- 50Forge · Anthropic marketplace and funding historyforgeglobal.com
- 51ARK Venture Fund · portfoliowww.ark-funds.com
- 52ARK Venture Fund · dated holding weightswww.ark-funds.com
- 53Claude Platform · API pricingplatform.claude.com
- 54Claude Platform · model documentationplatform.claude.com
- 55Anthropic · Sonnet 5.5 release and benchmarkswww.anthropic.com
- 56Anthropic · model system cardswww.anthropic.com
- 57Anthropic Economic Index · US usagewww.anthropic.com
- 58Ramp AI Index · business token spendingramp.com
- 59Ramp · provider switching dataramp.com
- 60Menlo Ventures · 2025 enterprise AI market studymenlovc.com
- 61Similarweb · Anthropic IPO traffic studywww.similarweb.com
- 62Cboe BZX · options on newly IPO'd equities rule filingcdn.cboe.com
- 63OCC · series searchwww.theocc.com
- 64CME Group · single-stock futures launchwww.cmegroup.com
- 65CME Group · listed single-stock futureswww.cmegroup.com
- 66NVIDIA · trailing sales datastockanalysis.com
- 67Microsoft · trailing sales datastockanalysis.com
- 68Alphabet · trailing sales datastockanalysis.com
- 69Amazon · trailing sales datastockanalysis.com
- 70Meta · trailing sales datastockanalysis.com
- 71Palantir · trailing sales datastockanalysis.com
- 72Reddit 2024 final prospectus · Offering, Capitalization, Underwriterswww.sec.gov
- 73Arm 2023 final prospectus · Offering, Share Capital, Underwritingwww.sec.gov
- 74Bank of America · Merrill broker-dealer affiliationcareers.bankofamerica.com
- 75Anthropic · IPO site, expected dates and public roadshowipo.anthropic.com
- 76Bloomberg · Goldman analysts model $685B of 2030 revenue, 10 Novwww.bloomberg.com
- 77Investopedia via Yahoo · reported Goldman forecast, 10 Novfinance.yahoo.com
- 78Anthropic · Australian prospectus, offer opens Nov 11 and closes Nov 17www.commsec.com.au
- 79Anthropic · UK retail flyer and indicative timetableassets.hl.uk
- 80SBI Securities · Japanese IPO applications announced Nov 12www.sbigroup.co.jp
- 81B Lab · voluntary certification processwww.bcorporation.net
- 82B Lab · public company directorywww.bcorporation.net
- 83Anthropic · 2026 Public Benefit Reportwww.anthropic.com
- 84Anthropic · Sheets, Whiteboards, Data and interactive connectors, Nov 10claude.com
- 85Microsoft · FY2026 annual report and product revenuewww.microsoft.com
- 86Alphabet · Q3 2026 earnings and Cloud revenueabc.xyz
- 87Fundrise · VCX NYSE listing announcementfundrise.com
- 88Fundrise VCX · June 30 economic holdings, SEC filingwww.sec.gov
- 89SpaceX · Q3 2026 10-Q, consolidated xAI and segment revenuewww.sec.gov
- 90SpaceX · market value and total shares referencestockanalysis.com
- 91Salesforce · trailing revenue and July 2026 periodstockanalysis.com
- 92Adobe · trailing revenue and August 2026 periodstockanalysis.com
- 93Oracle · trailing revenuestockanalysis.com
- 94Anthropic · Fable 5.2 release, prices and cross-vendor evaluations, Nov 9www.anthropic.com
- 95OpenAI · current API models and pricesdevelopers.openai.com
- 96Google · Gemini API prices and promotional datesaistudio.google.com
- 97OpenAI · consumer-led adoption and business footprint, Nov 2025openai.com
- 98Lightspeed · Anthropic had fewer than 100 employees in early 2023lsvp.com
- 99Nasdaq ISE · approved rule permitting large IPO options from second business daylistingcenter.nasdaq.com
- 100Kalshi · Anthropic IPO event contract and settlement ruleskalshi.com
- 101Robinhood Derivatives · event contract disclosure and CFTC classificationcdn.robinhood.com
- 102Bloomberg via The Business Times · venture and sovereign stake estimates, October 23www.businesstimes.com.sg
- 103Reuters via CNA · SpaceX IPO at $135, $75B base proceeds and $1.77T value, June 11www.channelnewsasia.com
- 104Saudi Exchange · 2019 Aramco IPO $25.6B and $1.7T equity valueannualreport.tadawulgroup.sa
- 105Alibaba · 2014 IPO pricing, 320.1M ADSs at $68www.alibabagroup.com
- 106Portfolio ThinkTank · A.I. Investing: Iconoclastic Predictionsportfoliothinktank.com
- 107James Damschroder · author biographyportfoliothinktank.com
- 108Anthropic Economic Index · business AI adoption and enterprise use, September 15, 2025www.anthropic.com
- 109Anthropic Economic Index · Cadences, June 26, 2026www.anthropic.com
- 110Forge · estimated historical valuations and dated financing records, reviewed November 12forgeglobal.com
- 111Nasdaq · 2025 ecosystem assets by vehicle and derivatives notionalwww.nasdaq.com
- 112S&P Global · 2024 survey, exchange-traded / other funds / derivatives / benchmarked assetsinvestorfactbook.spglobal.com
- 113FTSE Russell · December 2025 paper, 2024 active/passive AUM and size segmentswww.lseg.com
- 114FTSE Russell · $658B ETF reference, September 2024www.lseg.com
- 115SoftBank Group · $30B follow-on investment in OpenAI, February 27, 2026group.softbank
- 116GIC · Series F investment and Series G lead role, February 12, 2026; individual check undisclosedwww.gic.com.sg
- 117QIA · third consecutive Anthropic investment, Series F/G/H, May 28, 2026; individual check undisclosedqia.qa
- 118Bloomberg via Bloomberg Law · proposed MGX ticket of hundreds of millions, February 10, 2026; completed amount unconfirmednews.bloomberglaw.com
- 119Interactive Brokers · account platform and client types; general context, no Anthropic allocation establishedwww.interactivebrokers.com
- 120Fidelity · Q2 2026 business update, assets under administrationabout.fidelity.com
- 121Fidelity Capital Markets · 57 million customers as of December 31, 2025prime.fidelity.com
- 122Schwab · Q3 2026 10-Q, client assets, accounts and client cash percentagewww.sec.gov
- 123Interactive Brokers · October 2026 client equity, accounts and credit balanceswww.interactivebrokers.com
- 124Robinhood · Q3 2026 10-Q, platform assets, accounts, customers and cashwww.sec.gov
- 125Morgan Stanley · Q3 2026 financial supplement, self-directed channel assets and householdswww.morganstanley.com
- 126Bank of America · Q3 2026 supplement, Merrill Wealth Management balancesinvestor.bankofamerica.com
- 127Bank of America · Q3 2026 presentation, consumer investment assets and accountsinvestor.bankofamerica.com
- 128Vanguard · facts and figures, more than 50 million investors at year-end 2025corporate.vanguard.com
- 129Vanguard · June 4, 2026 transcript, approximately $12T AUM referencecorporate.vanguard.com
- 130ICI · money market assets, week ended November 4, 2026www.ici.org
- 131ICI · combined weekly mutual fund flows and ETF net issuance, week ended November 4, 2026www.ici.org
- 132U.S. Treasury · November 4, 2026 refunding statement and auction-size tablehome.treasury.gov
- 133SIFMA · October 2026 equity average daily volume, published November 5www.sifma.org
- 134BlackRock · Q3 2026 10-Q, $15.5T AUM and business scopewww.sec.gov
- 135BNY · Q3 2026 results, custody/administration and management assetsprodcs.bny.com
- 136State Street · Q3 2026 results, AUC/A, AUM and marketing-agent footnoteinvestors.statestreet.com
- 137Northern Trust · Q3 2026 results, custody/administration and management assetswww.sec.gov
- 138Capital Group · June 2026 AUM and dated investor reachwww.capitalgroup.com
- 139Wellington · June 30, 2026 AUM and client statisticswww.wellington.com
- 140Wellington · institutional client roles and delegated investment mandateswww.wellington.com
- 141JPMorganChase · Q3 2026 Asset & Wealth Management AUMwww.jpmorganchase.com
- 142T. Rowe Price · October 31, 2026 AUM, released November 11investors.troweprice.com
- 143BNY · clearing, intermediary and Pershing rolesprodcs.bny.com
- 144OpenAI / Chatterji et al. · How People Use ChatGPT, September 15, 2025 · historical weekly-use milestonescdn.openai.com
- 145OpenAI · October 2, 2024 · more than 250M weekly ChatGPT usersopenai.com
- 146OpenAI · September 29, 2026 DevDay recap · 1.2B weekly usersopenai.com
- 147OpenAI · December 8, 2025 enterprise AI report · per-worker and organization-level usageopenai.com
- 148OpenAI · June 30, 2026 · cohort adoption and usage depthopenai.com
- 149Anthropic · June 13, 2025 · agent and multi-agent token consumptionwww.anthropic.com
- 150Anthropic · November 4, 2025 · code execution and context-token efficiency examplewww.anthropic.com
- 151Epoch AI · AI chip sales, updated October 21, 2026; CSV retrieved November 13 · CC BYepoch.ai
- 152IEA · Energy and AI, April 2025 · historical data-center electricity estimates · CC BY 4.0www.iea.org
- 153IEA · Key Questions on Energy and AI, April 2026 · updated electricity outlook · CC BY 4.0www.iea.org
- 154NVIDIA · FY2025 sustainability report, p. 10 · workload-specific energy-efficiency comparisonimages.nvidia.com
- 155Anthropic · February 12, 2026 · Claude Code weekly active users doubled since January 1www.anthropic.com
Original outline coverage · 87 entries
Original order and indentation, linked to the sections where each item is addressed.
- Shares authorized / issued /offered
- Ticker / Listing
- International listings
- Company Size Relative to Market
- Probable Index Inclusions
- Guaranteed buyers of index funds
- AUM tied to market cap indexes
- Expected IPO price market cap comps
- Absorption economics
- Cash on hand
- Relative to avg daily trading
- Supply / Demand background
- Scarcity of A.I pure play tradables
- Book Runners
- IPO Syndicate (Stankey graphic)
- Allocation
- Retail vs Institutional
- Demand Curve
- Pricing
- Roadshow
- Timelines
- S1
- S1 revisions (date/ major delta)
- Roadshow
- Pricing
- Listing
- Trading
- Corporate Governance
- What’s a B Corp
- mission
- ESG Perspective
- Share Classes
- Lockups
- Employees
- ESOP
- VC’s
- Strategic partners
- Space X
- Amazon
- Nvdia
- other
- Greenshoe
- Executive Team
- Financials
- Revenue
- User Growth
- Compound Growth Curve
- Valuations
- Comps
- Public
- private
- A.I Marketplace
- https://www.anthropic.com/economic-index#us-usage
- Share of A.I Marketplace
- Previous Funding
- Date / amount / valuation (box growth graphic)
- Current Private Market Marketplaces
- Forge?
- Current Exposures
- Risks
- Lockin
- Open models
- Model pricing
- Model switching
- Valuation
- Rogue a.i
- concentration
- Company Size
- Customers
- Employees
- Web sites and traffic
- Company products
- Models
- Model monetization and consumption paths
- Benchmarked model performance
- Company Precis
- Define Anthropic
- Founded / former open a.i
- Orientation vs Open ai
- Headquarters
- Average pay
- Options and Derivatives
- Expected listings
- Single stock futures
- Other
- JDZ analysis
- Source index