Stock Screener Comparison Tool
Stock Screener Comparison Table
| wdt_ID | pricingtable | Finviz | Trading View | Yahoo | Macrotrends | FinScreener |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35 |  |
 |
 |
 |
||
| 38 | URL |
http://finviz.com | Trading View | https://finance.yahoo.com/screener | https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/stock-screener | https://www.finscreener.org/ |
| 39 | Summary |
Easy to use plus awesome heatmaps | TradingView is attempting to parlay their best of breed charting tool with a stock screener entrée - and it's surprisingly good | Yahoo tries to provide a one stop shop and has seperate screeners for ETF's Futures, Mutual funds and Stocks, plus premium screeners | Intuitive and easy to use, but there is not enough to keep me coming back | - |
| 40 | Specialities |
Data is standardized | Tons of technical indicators | Yahoo is going for breadth over depth with their screeners | None | - |
| 41 | Costs |
|||||
| 42 | Free version |
Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | - |
| 43 | Requires account |
No | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| 44 | Cost |
~$300 | $14.95 to 59.95 / Month | $350 / Year | Free | 89.99 / Year |
| 45 | Data |
|||||
| 46 | Data coverage |
US listed securities | 51,818 Securities around the Globe | Stocks, Mutual funds, ETF's Indicies | Poor | US listed |
| 47 | Original Data |
No | No | ESG scores, morningstar rating data | No | 4 Proprietary rankings for value, growth, income and global |
| 48 | Depth of data |
Decent | Good on Fundamentals and technical | Good | Poor | - |
| 49 | Field Count |
72 Free & Paid | 225 Fields | 92 Free, 108 Paid | 37 | 117 |
| 50 | Advanced features |
|||||
| 51 | Complex boolean |
No | No | No | No | No |
| 52 | Nested features |
No | No | No | No | No |
| 53 | Point in Time |
No | No | No | No | No |
| 54 | Screener analytics |
No | No | No | Category tabs but no aggregate | Category tabs, no customizations or aggregates |
| 55 | Screener backtesting |
No | No | No | No | No |
| 56 | Usability |
|||||
| 57 | UX |
Good | On par with charting apps, some avoidable complexity but overall high marks. Responsive design, but breaks down on a phone | A little clunky but workable | Basic, serviceable but easy to beat | Layout appears modern and is responsive but destroyed with ad support and |
| 58 | Alerts |
Yes, Paid | 1 for Free, Many with Paid | - | No | Yes |
| 59 | Support |
For paid users | With paid | - | - | |
| 60 | Support for saved screens |
Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| 61 | Custom fields in watchlists |
No | Few | 92 | No | - |
| 62 | Export |
Yes, With paid | with any Paid version | With paid | No | Yes |
| 63 | Longs |
Perhaps the best Free stock screener on the web? | dark mode, logos, complex operators, volume weighted indicators, global coverage | Offers a cool heatmap view of results | I like the layout and ease of use. | - |
| 64 | Shorts |
Finviz does not innovate fast and sometimes I want data that is not normalized | Could be integrated to watchlists, backtesting or point in time | Without Point in Time or Backtests, Yahoo needs some innovative data to hook me | Not enough data for Investment Professionals or Alpha seekers | - |
| 65 | Notes |
User friendly | After this review I will be trying the windows desktop app. This stock screener warrants consideration. Also the paid version is mostly just for charting and maybe not needed for the screener | Yahoo Finance Plus comes with other stuff, like historical data besides a better screener. The fair division between the free and paid does not yield the free as worthless | Basic entry level screener - people come to this site for long term historical charts | Nothing for free |
| 66 | Estimated Top Domain Traffic |
15,000,000 | 161,900,000 | 2,863,233 | 34,617 | |
| 67 | Yes | - | - | - | ||
| 70 | Sortable |
Yes | Yes | |||
| 71 | Contract |
No | No | |||
| 72 | API? |
No | No | |||
| 73 | Ad Supported |
In Free Version | In Free Version | |||
| 74 | Data Interval & Frequency |
Up to real time | ||||
| 75 | AutoRefresh |
Yes | With any Paid version | |||
| 76 | In Line Visualizations |
No | No | |||
| 77 | Extended Hours |
Yes, with paid | Yes | |||
| 78 | Integration |
No | Brokers, But not for screeners | |||
| 79 | Privacy |
Not sure why trading View needs to be able to read my tweets, lists and collections |